International Trade Economic Analysis for Indian Agriculture during WTO Regime: Effects on Production, Exports, Imports and Poverty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.93.10408Keywords:
International trade, Effects, Productions, Prices, PovertyAbstract
The law of comparative advantage is the cornerstone of international trade. Economic growth, agriculture, poverty reduction and trade have a very complicated relationship. Trade analysis helps any country to discover profitable opportunities; hence the study has undertaken with these objectives. To analyze agricultural trade growth, responsiveness, stability and estimate the effects on production, exports, imports and poverty and suggest polices for boosting Trade. The major agricultural commodities from 1990-91 to 2015-16 were selected. Estimated CAGR, Instability Index, Export import price elasticity’s and regression. During the period 1990-91 to 2015-16, wheat export price and rice import price growth rates were found to be more than other cereals. The imports price growth rate of all pulses were more than exports price growth rates indicating India is importing at higher prices. Among the oilseeds crops, mustard import price (11.05 %) and sunflower export price (7.85 %) growth rates are more. The export import quantity growth rate of all cereals, pulses, and oilseeds were found to be positive except rice imports, wheat exports and soybean imports which were negative. Export import prices of all cereals (except maize) and all pulses were found to be unstable. Import price of all oilseed crops were found to be stable (except mustard and sesamum). The study found that among cereals, pulses and oilseeds, rice (1.24 %), peas (2.36 %) and mustard (0.97 %) have high export elasticities indicating these crops highly responsive to change in international prices. The effect of trade on poverty shows that, production for cereals and pulses, import price for pulses and oilseeds, export price for all the 3 groups have adverse impact on Poverty. Only for oilseeds, production and trade balance have positive and significant effect on poverty. The effect of trade on poverty shows that, export price on all cereals, pulses, oilseeds have adverse impact on poverty. Only for oilseeds, production and trade balance have positive and significant effect on poverty. Thus import prices of cereals, quantity of imports for pulses and export prices of cereals, pulses and oilseeds need to be thoroughly examined and pre-requisite actions as well as policy measures are required. The study advocates that India should design self-reliance policies in pulse production as India is importing pulses at higher prices. India also should design new stable foreign price policy for cereals and pulses as export import prices of all cereals and all pulses were found to be unstable.
References
Aksoy, M.A., 2004. “Global Agricultural Trade Policies.” In M.A. Aksoy and J. C. Beghin (eds.), Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Alkhteeb TT, Sultan SA (2015). „Determinants of India‟s Agricultural Export‟, European Journal of Business and Management, 7(4):53-62.
Caine S (1958). Comments on Nurske‟s paper. Kyklos, Volume XI, pp. 187-193.
Dastagiri [2017] found that there is a need that the developing countries must follow strategic action to meet the future demands (2025) of the wheat, maize, soybean, pig meat, poultry meat, sheep meat, beef and veal.
Dastagiri, M.B. (2017) Global Agriculture: Vision and Approaches. European Scientific Journal, 13, 312-325.
David Hallam (2003), ‘Commodity Market Review 2003-2004’, UNFAO Commodity and Trade division, 2003, pp:3-18.
Dastagiri, M.B. and Anjani, S.V. (2018) The Political Economy of Global Agriculture: Effects on Agriculture, Farmers, Consumers and Economic Growth. European Scientific Journal, 14, 193-222. Dastagiri and Vajrala [2018, 16] reported that, since 2000 among WTO member countries, Russia, India, China and New Zealand have given more domestic support and Mexico, Chile, USA, Japan and OECD countries have given decreasing support to agricultural sector. 566
Dominick Salvatore, International Economics, 8th ed. (Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2004), 15.
Encyclopedia (2010), ‘World price’, The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). The Gale Group, Inc. Farmington Hills, USA.
Financial Dictionary (2012), ‘World price’, Ferlex financial dictionary, Ferlex Inc., Huntingdon Valley, USA.
Glezakos (1973) “Export instability and economic growth: a statistical verification‟, Economic Development and Cultural Change, volume 21:670-678.
Gohin.A, Moschini.G “Evaluating the market and welfare impacts of agricultural policies in developed countries: Comparison of partial and general equilibrium measures” REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, Vol.28, Issue: 2, Pages: 195-211, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006. 00281.x, Published: SUM 2006. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVERTY/Resources/335642-1124115102975/1555199-1124115187705/ch2.pdf
Jubair.BN, Alhiyali.ADK “An Economic Study of the Impact of Foreign Agricultural Trade and some Macroeconomic Variables on the Exchange Rate in Iraq using the Fmols Model for the period (1990 -2015)” IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, Vol.49, Issue: 4, Pages: 541-550, Published: 2018.
M. Aslam Chaudhary and Ashfaq A. Qaisrani “Trade instability, investment and economic growth in Pakistan” Pakistan Economic and Social Review, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Summer 2002), pp. 57-73.
Nurkse R (1958) “Quest for a stabilization policy in primary producing countries” Kyklos, volume 2:141-154. Santeramo.FG, Guerrieri.V and Lamonaca.E “On the Evolution of Trade and Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards: The Role of Trade Agreements” AGRICULTURE-BASEL, Vol.9, Issue: 1, Article Number: 2, DOI: 10.3390/agriculture9010002, Published: JAN 2019
Sarah Joseph “The WTO, Poverty, and Development” DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565894.003.0006. Satyanarayana.V, Wilson.WW, Johnson.DD, Dooley.FJ “Impacts of Trade and Agricultural Policies on the World Malt and Malting Barley Market” CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, Vol.46, Issue: 2, Pages: 127-147, DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.1998.tb00359.x, Published: JUL 1998.
Singh, K. and Sangla, K. (2012) An Analysis of India’s Exports (1991-2006). ZENITH International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 2, 79-108. http://zenithresearch.org.in/The World Bank IBRD IDA, The Role of Trade in Ending Povertyhttp://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade/publication/the-role-of-trade-in-ending-poverty
UNCTAD (2009) Impact of the Global Slowdown on India’s Exports and Employment. http://www.unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webditctncd2009d1_en.pdf
UPENDER, M “LONG RUN EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN INDIAS’S EXPORTS AND IMPORTS DURING 1949-50 -2004-05” Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol.7-1 (2007).
Wiggins.S “Trade Reform, Agriculture and Poverty in Developing Countries: A Review of the Empirical Evidence” AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND POVERTY MAKING: POLICY ANALYSIS COUNT, Book Group Author(s):OECD; OECD, Pages: 287-296, Published: 2003.
William Krist, Chapter 3: Trade Agreements and Economic Theory, Wilson Center Home About https://www.wilsoncenter.org/chapter-3-trade-agreements-and-economic-theory. Winters. LA “The European Agricultural Trade Policies and Poverty” EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS Vol.32, Issue: 3, Pages: 319-346, DOI: 10.1093/eurrag/jbi016, Published: Sep 1 2005.
World Bank (2014-15), Povcal Net, from Global Monitoring Report 2014/15.
World Bank Group and World Trade Organization, 2015. The Role of Trade in Ending Poverty. World Trade Organization: Geneva
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 M.B. Dastagiri, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, Sweta Mishra, L. Bhavigna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.