A New Cosmology Based on the Unified Complex Systems Theory (UCST)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1403.2406Keywords:
Unified Complex Systems Theory (UCST), New Cosmology, Cyclic World Evolution, Active Force, Non‑linear Redshift, Universe‑World Dichotomy, Air Medium, Dark Matter Replacement, Hubble Tension ResolutionAbstract
This paper presents a novel, self‑consistent cosmological framework rooted in Unified Complex System Theory (UCST), clarifying the fundamental distinction between the “Universe” and the “World” to resolve foundational flaws in modern cosmology. The Universe is defined as an infinite, eternal, philosophically transcendent spacetime totality beyond empirical observation. The World, by contrast, is the finite, observable spacetime domain that forms the proper subject of scientific cosmology, redefined here as the mathematical and experimental study of the World’s cyclic evolution—formation, persistence, decay, and regeneration—under strict mass, momentum, and energy conservation. Celestial bodies, particles, and atoms are categorized as “living agents” due to autonomous motion and adaptive responses, defined by dynamics rather than biological traits. Their motion is governed by conventional passive forces (gravity, electromagnetism, air damping) and intrinsic adaptive active forces, which stabilize orbits via natural energy compensation, removing the need for dark matter and dark energy. Supported by mathematical logic and qualitative agreement with observational phenomena, the proposed framework is shown to outperform the ΛCDM model in coherence, parsimony, predictive capability and falsifiability. Quantitative evaluation using empirical measurements is therefore necessitated. Where quantitative validity is established, key ΛCDM anomalies—including the Hubble tension, singularity, horizon, flatness, cosmological constant, dark sector puzzles and cosmic age discrepancies—may be resolved. Rigorous axiomatics and testable predictions are provided for independent validation, enabling this construct to be regarded as a coherent alternative paradigm in cosmology.
References
Alpher, R. A., Bethe, H., & Gamow, G. (1948). The Origin of Chemical Elements. Physical Review, 73, 803–804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.803.
Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. (2017). Small-scale challenges to the ΛCDM paradigm. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55, 343–384. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313.
Cui, W. C., Li, R., & Pan, L. L. (2025). Unified Complex Systems Theory (UCST): Resolving Materialist Dilemmas Through Dualist Ontology and Active Force. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(5), 517–545. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1305.19511.
Scholar Publishing Descartes, R. (1641/1984). Meditations on First Philosophy (trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch). In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., & Silk, J. (2021). In tension with ΛCDM? Nature Astronomy, 5(12), 1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01403-1.
Dodelson, S. (2021). Modern Cosmology (2nd ed.). Academic Press (Elsevier). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-00252-1.
Friedmann, A. (1922). Über die Krümmung des Raumes. Zeitschrift für Physik, 10, 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332580.
Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Books.
Hubble, E. P. (1929). A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168.
Jiang, L., et al. (2020). Evidence for GN-z11 as a luminous galaxy at redshift 10.957. Nature Astronomy. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-020- 01275-y.
Kuhn, R. L. (2024). A landscape of consciousness: Toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 190, 28–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.12.003.
Lenton, T. M. (1998). Gaia and natural selection. Nature, 394, 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/28792.
Lemaître, G. (1927). Un univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques. Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles A, 47, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3.
Lovelock, J. E. (1972). Gaia as seen through the atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 6(8), 579–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(72)90076-5.
Mather, J. C., et al. (1990). A Preliminary Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) Satellite. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 354, L37–L40. https://doi.org/10.1086/185717.
Milgrom, M. (1983). A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. The Astrophysical Journal, 270, 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/161130.
Particle Data Group. (2023). Cosmic Microwave Background. In Review of Particle Physics. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Penzias, A. A., & Wilson, R. W. (1965). A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s. The Astrophysical Journal, 142, 419–421. https://doi.org/10.1086/148307.
Perlmutter, S., et al. (1999). Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1086/307221.
Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910.
Riess, A. G., et al. (1998). Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. The Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009–1038. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499.
Riess, A. G., et al. (2019). A Precision Measurement of the Hubble Constant from the Hubble Space Telescope and Large Binocular Telescope. The Astrophysical Journal, 876(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422.
Scholar Publishing Sanders, R. H., & McGaugh, S. S. (2002). Modified Newtonian Dynamics as an alternative to dark matter. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 40, 263–317. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093923.
Smoot, G. F., et al. (1992). Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps. The Astrophysical Journal, 396, L1–L5. https://doi.org/10.1086/186504.
Will, C. M. (2014). The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/lrr-2014-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 European Journal of Applied Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.