Reclamation of Galamsey Land is Not Land Restoration: The Land Beyond Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1405.12498Keywords:
Galamsey, Soil profile, Land reclamation, Agricultural productivity, Ecosystem restorationAbstract
Agriculture is not the only imperative for land reclamation. In Ghana, conflation of disapproval, and clarion call for compulsory reclamation of ‘galamey’-degraded arable lands, by the moral society and eco-conscious minority in order to sustain biodiversity, agricultural productivity, environmental safety, and public health is muffled by the oratory artifice of utilitarians (both utilitarian narrowness and indifference) and the financial might of political financiers fronting for international gold merchants. The coup de grace is delivered by unpatriotic, unethical, and compromised environmental scientists and scholars whose acquiescence legitimized the false scientific narrative of synonymy of land reclamation to land ecosystem restoration. The error builds complacency that weakens collective revulsion for the insensate destruction of nature by illegal small-scale gold mining; believing that, remedy lies in merely covering up dugouts or levelling up degraded areas and re-vegetating them. Neither ignorance nor conceptual oversight is an alibi; the interchangeable use of land reclamation and land restoration is a veneer by insincere political actors to shirk responsibility for a national course, and sophism by opportunistic scientists and scholars to plunder and pillage national resources in a course which does not fully address a national tragedy! Presently (2026), the ever-changing estimated cost of reclaiming a hectare of galamsey-degraded arable land is $48 thousand; $264 million for the over 5 500 hectares degraded so far. But, the overall national conservative budgetary estimate for reclamation and short-term restoration (for arable purpose only) of the same 5 500-plus hectares, is a whopping $17 billion! Yes, degraded lands must be reclaimed at all cost but, further efforts must be expended to attain land ecosystem restoration in the end. Land reclamation is only the important first step in the long journey to land ecosystem restoration; it is not an end in itself. This is the thesis of this scientific master piece.
References
1.Krishnakumar, S., Kumar, S.R., Mariappan, N. and Surendar, K.K. (2013). Biochar-boon to soil health and crop production. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(38): pp. 4726-4739.
2.Jackson, R.M., and Raw, F. (1973). Life in the Soil; 59 pp. Arnold [1973], London. Available at East Carolina University (ECU) Libraries Catalog.
3.https://www.agropublishers.com/2024: Understanding soil profiles
4.Tate, R.L. (1995). Soil Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
5.https://www.taurus.ag/plantnutrition/2025: Understanding cation exchange capacity)
6.College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences (CAES) Field Report 2 (2025). University of Georgia, Atlanta-USA
7.Danyo, G., and Osei-Bonsu, A. (2016). Illegal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Ghana: A threat to Food Security. Journal of Food Security (JFS), Vol.4 (5): pp.112-119
8.US National Research Council, USNRC (1992). Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology, and public policy. Washington, DC: National Academy)
9.Elliott, R. (2000). Faking nature. In Environmental restoration: Ethics, theory, and practice. Edited by William Throop, 71–82. Flashpoints. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books
10.Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74; pp.19–31
11.Joynews on JoyTV, Ghana (7/09/2026)
12.Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group, 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International
13.Bradshaw, A.D. (1997). Restoration of mined lands—using natural processes. Ecological Engineering 8.4: 255 –269.
14.Hobbs, R.J., and Norton, D. A. (1996). Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4.2: 93–110).
15.Young, T.P. (2000). Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biological Conservation 92.1: 73–83.
16.Falk, D.A., Palmer, M.A., and Zedler, J.B., eds. (2006). Foundations of restoration ecology. Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Washington, DC: Island)
17.Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of Soil Formation: a system of quantitative pedology. McGraw-Hill Book, Co., New York, 281 pp
18.Amundson, R. and Jenny, H. (1991). The Place of Humans in the State Factor Theory of Ecosystems and their Soils. Soil Sci. 151:99-109
19.FAO, 2005. The importance of soil organic matter: key to drought-resistant soil and sustained food production. FAO Soils Bulletin, No. 80. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nation, Rome, Italy. pp.11-47
20.Tate, R.L., and Ensign, J.C. (1974). Picolinic acid hydroxylase of Arthrobacter picolinophilus. Can. J. Microbiol. 20:695-702
21.Hirschberg, R. L., and Ensign, J.C. (1972). Oxidation of nicotinic acid by a bacillus species: Source of oxygen atoms for the hydroxylation of nicotinic acid to 6-hydroxynicotinic acid. J. Bacteriol. 108:757-759].
22.Ritz, K., McHugh, M., Harris, J.A. (2004). Biological diversity and function in soils: contemporary perspectives and implications in relation to the formulation of effective indicators. In: Agricultural soil erosion and soil biodiversity: Developing ındicators for policy analyses. Francaviglia, R. (Ed.), OECD, Paris, France. pp. 563-572).
23.Usman, S., Muhammad, Y., and Chiroman, A. (2016). Roles of soil biota and biodiversity in soil environment – A concise communication. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science Vol (
24.FAO (2007). Soil Biota and Biodiversity: the “Root” of Sustainable Agriculture. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nation, Rome, Italy. pp.1-4.
25.Denef, K., Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Frey, S.D., Elliott, E.T., Merckx, R., Paustian, K. (2001). Influence of dry–wet cycles on the interrelationship between aggregate, particulate organic matter, and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33(12-13): 1599-1611. e, Italy. pp.11-47
26.Domínguez, A., Bedano, J.C., Becker, A.R., Arolfo, R.V. (2014). Organic farming fosters agroecosystem functioning in Argentinian temperate soils: Evidence from litter decomposition and soil fauna. Applied Soil Ecology 83:170–176.
27.Eskelinen, A., Stark, S., Männistö, M. (2009). Links between plant community composition, soil organic matter quality and microbial communities in contrasting tundra habitats. Oecologia 161(1): 113–123.)
28.Vandermeer, J., Perfecto, I., 1995. Breakfast of biodiversity: the truth about rainforest destruction. Food First Books, Oakland, 185 ppPerry, D.A., 1994. Forest Ecosystems. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 649 pp.
29.Perry, D.A., 1994. Forest Ecosystems. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 649 pp.
30.Tate, R.L., III. (1987). Soil Organic Matter. Biological and Ecological Effects. John Wiley & Sons. New York, 291 pp
31.Kardol P., and Wardle, D.A. (2010). How understanding aboveground–belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25.11: 670–679).
32.Bardgett, R.D., 2005. The biology of soil: A community and ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. 242 p. Kramer, C., Gleixner, G., 2008. Soil organic matter in soil depth profiles: Distinct carbon preferences of microbial groups during carbon transformation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40(2): 425-433.
33.Friedmann, E.I. (1982). Endolithic microorganisms in the Antarctic cold desert. Science 215:1045-1053.
34.Johnston, C.G., and Vestal, J.R. (1991). Photosynthetic carbon incorporation and turnover in Antarctic crypto- endolithic microbial communities: Are they the slowest-growing organisms on Earth? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:2308-2311].
35.Dommergues, Y.R., Belsar, L.W., and Schmidt, E.L (1978). Limiting factors for microbial growth and activity in soil. In: M. Alexander (ed.) Advances in Microbial Ecology. 249-104. Plenum Press. New York].
36.Barrios, E. (2007). Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity. Ecological Economics 64(2): 269–285).
37.Nietko, K.F., and Frankenberg Jr, W.T. (1989). Biosynthesis of cytokinins in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:735-740.
38.Tien, T.M., Gaskins, M.H., and Hubell, D.H. (1979). Plant growth substance produced by Azospirillum brasilense, and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37:1016-1024.Friedmann, E.I. (1982). Endolithic microorganisms in the Antarctic cold desert. Science 215:1045-1053.
39.Lal, R. (2004). Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Science, 304, 1643-1627.
40.Castro-Huerta, R.A., Falco, L.B., Sandler, R.V., Coviella, C.E., 2015. Differential contribution of soil biota groups to plant litter decomposition as mediated by soil use.
41.Swift, M.J., Heal, O.W., Anderson, J.M., 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles, USA. 372p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gilbert Danyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.