Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles Enhance Morphophysiological Performance and Biochemical of Soybean (Glycine Max L.) cv. Gepak Kuning Under PEG-Induced Drought Stress

Authors

  • Satrio Lintang Pambudi Study Program of Magister of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
  • Berlian Rosilia Shodiqin Graduate School of Biotechnology, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
  • Almas Nurazita Suwarno Graduate School of Biotechnology, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Ubaidillah Graduate School of Biotechnology, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia, Graduate School of Biotechnology, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia and Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia
  • Tri Agus Siswoyo Graduate School of Biotechnology, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia, Departement of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia and The Center of Excellence on Crop Industrial Biotechnology (PUI-PT BioTIn), University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1404.12026

Keywords:

Drought stress, PEG, Glycine max L., Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles, Morphophysiology

Abstract

The application of silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles has emerged as a promising approach to enhance plant tolerance to drought stress by improving morphophysiological and biochemistry performance. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 100 ppm SiO2 nanoparticles on the morphophysiological responses of the soybean cultivar Gepak Kuning under normal conditions and polythlene glycol (PEG) 6000-induced drought stress. The evaluated parameters included plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, root length, number of nodules, percentage of active nodules, photosynthetic pigment content, relative water content, electrolyte leakage, protein content, proline content, proline to protein ratio, total flavonoid content, total phenolic content, and plant biomass. The results showed that the application of SiO2 nanoparticles significantly improved morphological characteristics, including plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, root length, number of nodules, and the percentage of active nodules. The treatment also enhanced photosynthetic pigment content, including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, and total chlorophyll, as well as protein content, relative water content, and plant biomass. In addition, SiO2 nanoparticles reduced oxidative stress by decreasing the chlorophyll a/b ratio, carotenoid to total chlorophyll ratio, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), proline content, proline to protein ratio, total flavonoid content, total phenolic content, and fresh and dry biomass losses under drought stress. These findings indicate that the application of SiO2 nanoparticles enhances soybean tolerance to drought stress by improving morphophysiological performance, maintaining plant water status, regulating stress-related metabolite accumulation, and promoting biomass production.

References

A. Kumar, P. Dhansu, and A. Mann, ‘Salinity and Drought Tolerance in Plants: Physiological Perspectives’, Salinity and Drought Tolerance in Plants: Physiological Perspectives, no. October, pp. 1–602, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4669-3.

I. S. Petrushin, I. A. Vasilev, and Y. A. Markova, ‘Drought Tolerance of Legumes: Physiology and the Role of the Microbiome’, Curr. Issues Mol. Biol., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 6311–6324, 2023, doi: 10.3390/cimb45080398.

O. Basal and A. Szabó, ‘Physiology, yield and quality of soybean as affected by drought stress’, Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 2020, doi: 10.35495/AJAB.2019.11.505.

H. Arya, M. B. Singh, and P. L. Bhalla, ‘Towards Developing Drought-smart Soybeans’, Front. Plant Sci., vol. 12, no. October, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.750664.

K. Gautam, H. Singh, and A. K. Sinha, ‘Nanotechnology in Plant Nanobionics: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Perspectives’, Adv. Biol., vol. 9, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.1002/adbi.202400589.

N. Thakur and A. N. Yadav, ‘Nanotechnology in Agriculture: A Review on Precision Farming and Sustainable Crop Production’, Bionanoscience, vol. 15, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12668-025-01861-2.

S. Roghie, G. Shiade, R. De Mello, P. Amin, F. Rogério, and F. Carvalho, ‘Silicon at the Frontline: Enhancing Plant Multistress Tolerance’, pp. 3089–3111, 2026.

S. Esmaili, V. Tavallali, and B. Amiri, ‘Nano-Silicon Complexes Enhance Growth, Yield, Water Relations and Mineral Composition in Tanacetum parthenium under Water Deficit Stress’, Silicon, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2493–2508, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12633-020-00605-z.

B. Sanusi, A. Z. Inyass, S. Zubaidatu, T. E. Barbra, H. Saleh, and M. L. Umar, ‘Effect of drought stress on some morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters in soybean (TGX-1835-10E) variety’, Discover Plants, vol. 2, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44372-025-Scholar Publishing

Z. I. Mufida, ‘Morpho-physiological and Production Responses of Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L .) to Biostimulant Protein Hydrolysate Under Drought Stress’, vol. 13, no. 04, pp. 113–122, 2025, doi: 10.14738/aivp.1304.19159.Mufida.

R. J. Porra, ‘Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents : verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy’, vol. 975, pp. 384–394, 1989.

V. do Rosário Rosa et al., ‘Drought stress during the reproductive stage of two soybean lines’, Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras., vol. 55, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: 10.1590/S1678-3921.PAB2020.V55.01736.

Velikova, ‘oxidative stress and some antioxidant systens in acid rain-treated bean plants’, Physical Review, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 1709–1714, 1999, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.176.1709.

Bradford, ‘a rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding’, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., vol. 30, pp. 1–6, 1976, doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.10.005.

M. R. Lee, C. S. Kim, T. Park, Y. S. Choi, and K. H. Lee, ‘Optimization of the ninhydrin reaction and development of a multiwell plate-based high-throughput proline detection assay’, Anal. Biochem., vol. 556, no. June, pp. 57–62, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.06.022.

M. S. Taga, E. E. Miller, and D. E. Pratt, ‘Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants’, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 928–931, 1984, doi: 10.1007/BF02542169.

S. Pradipta, T. R. I. A. Siswoyo, and M. Ubaidillah, ‘Nutraceuticals and bioactive properties of local Java pigmented rice’, no. January, 2023, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d240166.

S. A. Abdulla and K. A. Rahman, ‘Combination Effects of Rhizobium sp. and Nano-Fe on Growth, Nodulation, and Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)’, Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 25–33, 2023, doi: 10.52951/dasj.23150203.

M. Bukan, S. Kereša, I. Pejić, A. Sudarić, A. Lovrić, and H. Šarčević, ‘Variability of Root and Shoot Traits under PEG-Induced Drought Stress at an Early Vegetative Growth Stage of Soybean’, Agronomy, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3390/agronomy14061188.

M. Sintaha, C. K. Man, W. S. Yung, S. Duan, M. W. Li, and H. M. Lam, ‘Drought Stress Priming Improved the Drought Tolerance of Soybean’, Plants, vol. 11, no. 21, 2022, doi: 10.3390/plants11212954.

C. Wang et al., ‘Drought and rewatering effects on soybean photosynthesis, physiology and yield’, PeerJ, vol. 13, pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.7717/peerj.19658.

P. Negi et al., ‘Transcriptional reprogramming and enhanced photosynthesis drive inducible salt tolerance in sugarcane mutant line M4209’, J. Exp. Bot., vol. 71, no. 19, pp. 6159–6173, 2020, doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa339.

J. Xu, L. Guo, and L. Liu, ‘Exogenous silicon alleviates drought stress in maize by improving growth, photosynthetic and antioxidant metabolism’, Environ. Exp. Bot., vol. 201, no. June, p. 104974, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104974.

K. S. Siddiqi, A. Husen, N. Zahra, and A. Moheman, ‘Harnessing silicon nanoparticles and various forms of silicon for enhanced plant growth performance under salinity stress: application and mechanism’, Discover Nano, vol. 20, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s11671-025-

M. Chen et al., ‘Integrated physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses of drought stress alleviation in Ehretia macrophylla Wall. seedlings by SiO2 NPs (silica Scholar Publishing nanoparticles)’, Front. Plant Sci., vol. 15, no. February, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1260140.

Y. M. Rashad, H. H. A. El-Sharkawy, B. E. A. Belal, E. S. Abdel Razik, and D. A. Galilah, ‘Silica Nanoparticles as a Probable Anti-Oomycete Compound Against Downy Mildew, and Yield and Quality Enhancer in Grapevines: Field Evaluation, Molecular, Physiological, Ultrastructural, and Toxicity Investigations’, Front. Plant Sci., vol. 12, no. October, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.763365.

S. Namjoyan, A. Sorooshzadeh, A. Rajabi, and M. Aghaalikhani, ‘Nano-silicon protects sugar beet plants against water deficit stress by improving the antioxidant systems and compatible solutes’, Acta Physiol. Plant., vol. 42, no. 10, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11738-020-

J. Wang, H. Wu, Y. Wang, W. Ye, X. Kong, and Z. Yin, ‘Small particles, big effects: How nanoparticles can enhance plant growth in favorable and harsh conditions’, J. Integr. Plant Biol., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1274–1294, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jipb.13652.

M. Chen et al., ‘Integrated physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses of drought stress alleviation in Ehretia macrophylla Wall. seedlings by SiO2 NPs (silica nanoparticles)’, Front. Plant Sci., vol. 15, no. February, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1260140.

E. S. Okeke, E. J. Nweze, T. C. Ezike, C. O. Nwuche, T. P. C. Ezeorba, and C. E. I. Nwankwo, ‘Silicon-based nanoparticles for mitigating the effect of potentially toxic elements and plant stress in agroecosystems: A sustainable pathway towards food security’, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 898, no. July, p. 165446, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165446.

V. D. Rajput et al., ‘Effects of silicon and silicon-based nanoparticles on rhizosphere microbiome, plant stress and growth’, Biology (Basel)., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/biology10080791.

W. Weisany, J. Razmi, A. H. Eshaghabadi, and D. Pashang, ‘Silicon Nanoparticles (SiNP): A Novel and Sustainable Strategy for Mitigating Environmental Stresses in Plants’, J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 2167–2191, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42729-024-01790-1.

S. Daler et al., ‘Silicon Nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs) Boost Drought Tolerance in Grapevines by Enhancing Some Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Traits’, Plant Mol. Biol. Report., no. 0123456789, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11105-024-01520-y.

J. Wei et al., ‘Silicon Nano-Fertilizer-Enhanced Soybean Resilience and Yield Under Drought Stress’, Plants, vol. 14, no. 5, 2025, doi: 10.3390/plants14050751.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Pambudi, S. L., Shodiqin, B. R., Suwarno, A. N., Ubaidillah, M., & Siswoyo, T. A. (2026). Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles Enhance Morphophysiological Performance and Biochemical of Soybean (Glycine Max L.) cv. Gepak Kuning Under PEG-Induced Drought Stress. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(04), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1404.12026