Reconstruction of General Relativistic Phenomena and Localization Model of Quantum Entanglement Based on UCST Unified Realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/ejas.1403.11927Keywords:
Unified Complex System Theory (UCST), Unified Realism, General Relativity (GR), Spacetime Curvature, Active Force, Gaseous Medium, Quantum Entanglement, Locality, Alternative Gravity Theories, Quantum Communication EngineeringAbstract
Within modern physics, classical mechanics, general relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics adopt mutually exclusive ontological assumptions, creating persistent irreconcilable contradictions. GR describes gravitation via spacetime curvature yet suffers from spacetime singularities, unobserved dark matter/dark energy hypotheses, and fundamental incompatibility with quantum theory. Quantum entanglement is conventionally interpreted as nonlocal correlation, violating classical locality and triggering decades of foundational physics debate. Based on Unified Complex System Theory (UCST, Unified Realism), this paper establishes four core ontological postulates: active-passive force dichotomy, universal gaseous air medium for force transmission, absolute flat space paired with relative descriptive time, and generalized living entities. This framework abandons the spacetime curvature hypothesis entirely and constructs a unified physical interpretation system built on coupling between gaseous air medium perturbations and interactive forces. Constrained by locality, slow attenuation and experimental self-consistency, three hierarchical entanglement intensity decay functions are derived to achieve fully localized quantum entanglement modeling, integrating quantum correlations into UCST’s medium-mediated force transmission architecture. UCST reproduces all validated classical mechanical results and quantitatively recovers core relativistic astronomical observables—Mercury/Venus perihelion precession, gravitational light deflection, gravitational redshift, black hole physics, gravitational lensing and gravitational waves—without invoking geometric spacetime constructs. The three proposed entanglement decay functions satisfy strict locality constraints while matching long-range quantum communication experimental measurements, resolving quantum mechanics’ nonlocality paradox. This work forms a quantitatively complete, logically closed unified theoretical paradigm spanning macroscopic astrophysics and microscopic quantum physics, offering a novel research pathway for the grand unification of fundamental physics.
References
Brans, C. H. (2014). Jordan–Brans–Dicke Theory. Scholarpedia, 9(4), 31358. https://scholarpedia.org/article/Jordan-Brans-Dicke_Theory
Cui, W. C. (2026a). Reconstruction of mathematical philosophy and fundamental axiom system based on unified complex system theory. Philosophy Study, 16(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2026.03.008
Cui, W. C. (2026b). Revision of mathematical principles of natural philosophy based on the UCST realism framework. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(3), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1403.10518
Cui, W. C. (2026c). On the rationality of aether as an ontological candidate in physics. Philosophy Study, 16(3), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2026.03.002
Cui, W. C., Li, R., & Pan, L. L. (2025). Unified complex systems theory (UCST): resolving materialist dilemmas through dualist ontology and active force. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(5), 517–545. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1305.19511
Einstein, A. (1916). Relativity: the special and general theory. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Fitzpatrick, R. (2015). Quantum mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific.
Gánti, T. (2003). The principles of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, H., Poole, C., & Safko, J. (2002). Classical mechanics (3rd ed.). London: Pearson.
Griffiths, D. (2008). Introduction to elementary particles. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Kiefer, C. (2021). Bridging the divide between quantum and gravitational physics. Science, 372(6541), 512–515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb1093
Leggett, A. J. (2003). Nonlocal Hidden-Variable Theories and Quantum Mechanics: An Incompatibility Theorem. Foundations of Physics, 33(10), 1469–1493. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026096313729
McGaugh, S. S. (2021). Cosmological puzzles: dark matter, dark energy, and the breakdown of standard gravity. Reviews of Modern Physics, 93(3), 035002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035002
Milgrom, M. (1983). A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. The Astrophysical Journal, 270, 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/161130
Necib, L., & Trodden, M. (2021). The elusive dark universe: unconfirmed hypotheses as stopgaps for gravitational theory. Science, 374(6566), 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi8442
Polchinski, J. (1998). String Theory Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-63303-1.
Rovelli, C. (1996). Quantum gravity: a review. Reviews of Modern Physics, 68(3), 1275–1342. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1275
Rovelli, C. (2008). Loop Quantum Gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 11(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2008-5
Seiberg, N. (2020). The incompatibility at the heart of physics. Nature Physics, 16(10), 1018–1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01021-9
Valentini, A. (2026). Beyond the quantum: a quest for the origin and hidden meaning of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scholar Publishing Weinberg, D. J. (2020). The cosmological crisis: when dark components fail experimental test. Nature Astronomy, 4(11), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1208-6
Whitaker, A. (2006). Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma: from quantum theory to quantum information (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 European Journal of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
