Untying the Agronomic Paradox of Weeding Yield Loss under Tropical Dew-fall Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1402.19937Keywords:
Arachis hypogaea, foliar water uptake, dew-weed microclimate, sustainable agriculture, stress gradient hypothesisAbstract
The foundational paradigm of weed science established through decades of agronomic research posits that weeds act as direct competitors to crops for essential resources, invariably causing significant yield suppression. This principle is particularly emphasized for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), a vital legume for global food security, due to its slow initial growth. However, this universally accepted doctrine is challenged by emerging observations from specific agro-ecological niches characterized by pronounced tropical dew-fall, where unweeded groundnut plots have been observed to outperform the weeded counterparts. A field experiment was conducted using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications to investigate this anomaly. Treatments consisted of a weeded control (W), manually weeded at 45 Days After Planting (DAP), and an unweeded treatment (UW). The results clearly validated the yield anomaly. The unweeded treatment demonstrated 44.9% higher final dry pod yield (150.41 g/plot) compared to the weeded control (103.84 g/plot), translating to 30.96% yield loss attributable to weeding. Unweeded plots also produced 21.5% more pods per plant and 31.7% higher fresh plant biomass. Early growth stages showed no competitive suppression. These findings robustly confirmed that the net effect of weed community in this environment was profoundly facilitative. The results were interpreted as strong evidence for a proposed mechanism where weed understorey enhanced dew capture and retention, and the groundnut crop utilized this supplementary moisture via foliar water uptake. That led to improved water status and photosynthetic efficiency that overwhelmingly offset the costs of below-ground competition. It was concluded that the universal agronomic paradigm that mandates routine weeding for groundnut was not applicable in tropical dew-fall environments and a paradigm shift therefore recommended towards context-specific management that leverages beneficial ecological interactions.
References
Akobundu, I. O., & Agyakwa, C. W. (1998). A handbook of West African weeds. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
Bhovva, M. C., & Sardana, S. (2006). Efficacy of imazethapyr on weed control and productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science, 38(3&4), 268-270.
Chikoye, D., Ekeleme, F., & Ambe, J. T. (2002). Evaluation of a new herbicide, oxadiazon, for weed control in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Nigeria. Crop Protection, 21(1), 47-53. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2023). FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/
Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Kidron, G. J., Barzilay, E., & Sachs, E. (2000). Microclimate control upon sand microbiotic crusts, western Negev Desert, Israel. Geomorphology, 36(1-2), 1-18.
R-Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Yates, R. A., & Sparks, D. (1993). Foliar absorption and translocation of water and nutrients in peanut. In Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Education Society (Vol. 25, p. 52).
Zimdahl, R. L. (2018). Fundamentals of weed science (5th ed.). Academic Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juana Paul Moiwo, Emmanuel Amara, Georgiana Allie, Tuwoh Weiwoh Moiwo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.