Bioequivalence Study of Acemetacin Tablets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1402.20105Keywords:
Acemetacin, Bioequivalence, Extended Release Capsules, Pharmacokinetics, LC-MS/MS, Crossover Study, Fed Condition, NSAIDAbstract
Background and Objective: Acemetacin is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) structurally derived as a glycolic acid ester of indomethacin, exerting its pharmacological activity through both acemetacin and its primary metabolite, indomethacin. It is indicated for the management of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, acute gouty arthritis, acute musculoskeletal pain, postoperative pain, and dysmenorrhea. The objective of this study was to evaluate and establish the bioequivalence of Acetudil 90 mg Extended Release Capsules (Test; Santa Farma İlaç San. A.Ş, Turkey) with Rantudil® Retard 90 mg Extended Release Capsules (Reference; MEDA Pharma İlaç San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Şti, Turkey) in healthy adult human subjects under fed conditions. Methods: This was an open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, four-period, single-dose, fully replicate crossover bioequivalence study conducted under fed conditions in healthy adult male and/or non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female volunteers aged 18 to 45 years with a BMI of 18.50–29.99 kg/m². A total of 48 subjects were enrolled, of whom 47 completed the study. A single oral dose of the test or reference product was administered as per the randomization schedule, and serial blood samples were collected over 18 hours post-dose. Plasma concentrations of acemetacin were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS analytical method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed using Phoenix® WinNonlin v8.1, and statistical analysis was performed on ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters using SAS® v9.4. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were Cmax and AUC₀₋ₜ. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the test to reference product for both Cmax and AUC₀₋ₜ fell within the pre-specified acceptance range of 80.00–125.00%. Results: The geometric mean ratio (Test/Reference) for ln-transformed Cmax was 95.03% with a 90% CI of 84.51%–106.84%, and for ln-transformed AUC₀₋ₜ was 98.96% with a 90% CI of 94.47%–103.65%, both falling within the pre-defined bioequivalence acceptance criteria of 80.00–125.00%. The intra-subject coefficient of variation (%CV) for Cmax was 44.83% (R vs R) and 46.78% (T vs R), while for AUC₀₋ₜ it was 16.83% (R vs R) and 17.74% (T vs R). Both products were well tolerated; only one non-serious adverse event was reported following administration of the reference product, and no serious adverse events were reported during the conduct of the study. Conclusion: Bioequivalence was successfully demonstrated between Acetudil 90 mg Extended Release Capsules (Test) and Rantudil® Retard 90 mg Extended Release Capsules (Reference) in healthy adult human subjects under fed conditions, with both primary pharmacokinetic parameters meeting the regulatory acceptance criteria. Both formulations were found to be safe and well tolerated at the administered dose.
References
Chavez-Pina AE, Tapia-Alvarez GR, Navarrete A. Inhibition of endogenous hydrogen sulfide synthesis by PAG protects against ethanol-induced gastric damage in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;630(1-3):131-6.
Notarianni LJ, Collins AJ. The comparative pharmacokinetics of acemetacin in young subjects and elderly patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;32(3):389-92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1888622/Müller-Fassbender H. Acemetacin versus indomethacin — comparative endoscopy studies on gastric tolerability. Arzneimittelforschung. 1986.
Bori-Segura R, Hernandez-Cruz B, Garcia de Vicuña Pinedo R. Efficacy and tolerability of acemetacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in Mexican patients: Result of the ETAPAM study. Reumatol Clin. 2002. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11032304 Chou CT, Tsai YY. A double-blind comparison of acemetacin and indomethacin in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Pharmacol Res. 2002;22:1-6.
Jacobi H, Werz G, Kamp R, Kohler G, Schollnhammer G. On the pharmacodynamics of acemetacin. Arzneimittelforschung. 1980;30(6a):1120-7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6968219/Tavares IA, Bennett A. Acemetacin: anti-inflammatory activity and gastrointestinal safety. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm. 1993.
Wallace JL, Arfors KE, McKnight GW. A monoclonal antibody against the CD18 leukocyte adhesion molecule prevents indomethacin-induced gastric damage in the rabbit. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:878-83.
Zanardo RC, Brancaleone V, Distrutti E, Fiorucci S, Cirino G, Wallace JL. Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous modulator of leukocyte-mediated inflammation. FASEB J. 2006;20:2118-20.
Wallace JL, Reuter BK, McKnight GW, Bak A. Selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2: are they really effective, selective, and GI-safe? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27(Suppl 1):S28-34. Zhao YJ, Ni LQ, Zhang ZL, Zhou JL, Lao ZY, Chen LH. Pharmacokinetics of indomethacin, a metabolite of acemetacin, following oral administration of acemetacin sustained-release tablets and capsules. J Health Sci. 2005;51(3):308-14. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jhs/51/3/51_3_308/_pdf
Klinkhoff AV, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Carette S, Chalmers A, Esdaile JM, et al. An experiment in reducing interobserver variability of the examination for joint tenderness. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:492-4.
Leeb BF, Andel I, Sautner J, Nothnagl T, Rintelen B. The DAS28 in rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia patients. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1021-1025.
Saul A. Acemetacin versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis — a comparative study. Curr Med Res Opin. 1991;12:342-8.
Kamp R, Kohler G, Schollnhammer G. Retard effect of acemetacin from a commercial preparation — kinetics in humans following single and multiple administration. Arzneimittelforschung. 1986;36(3):508-11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3718599/European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence [Internet]. London: EMA; 2010 [cited 2026 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-investigationbioequivalence-rev1_en.pdf
Scholar Publishing Dinnendahl V, Fricke U, editors. Acemetacin. In: Arzneistoff-Profile. Eschborn: Govi-Verlag; 2010. Moore RA, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral acemetacin for acute postoperative pain in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD007589. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4170991/Chavez-Pina AE, McKnight GW, Dicay M, Castellanos-Blanco MS, Motley ED, Wallace JL. Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory activity and gastric safety of acemetacin. Br J Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;152(6):930-8. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2078220/Wallace JL, Caliendo G, Santagada V, Cirino G. Lack of effects of acemetacin on signalling pathways for leukocyte adherence may explain its gastrointestinal safety. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;155(6):857-64. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2597236/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arjun Arumugam Olaganathan, Geetha Lakshmi Gunasekaran, Nageswara Rao. Thalapaneni, Srinivas Gopineedu, Ersin Yildirim, Murat Sari, Büşra Demir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.