Democratic Innovation and Participation as Part of the New Public Management: A Critical Review of Gender Mainstreaming in the Kenyan Legislature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1305.19527Keywords:
Democratic innovation, democratic participation, gender mainstreaming, policy, legislativeAbstract
There has been a proliferation of democratic innovations aimed at improving democratic systems within a particular social, political and economic environment. This study aimed to evaluate the extent to which an innovative democratic approach, namely gender equity and equality, has been mainstreamed as part of democratic participation in the new public management in the Kenyan legislature. The study applied three complementary theories, that is, (1) the democratic innovation theory (Asenbaum, 2021; Cunningham, 2002; Elstub et al., 2016; Elstub & Escobar, 2019; Fung, 2015; Smith, 2005; 2009; 2019); and (2) changing organisational culture (Cameron & Quinn, 2006); both leading to (3) competing values in public administration (Hood, 1991). Findings revealed that there were certain achievements, just as there were challenges, in order to achieve the stipulations of the gender rule in a social-cultural and political context. This is because despite its legal basis, a democratic innovation may lack a basis in social-cultural settings and thus by itself, in law or out of law, it does not, and may not, automatically lead to democratic participation. Instead, it is imperative that the social context and both the more informal and formal principal laws operate side by side to promote participatory democracy, rather than a fixation on democratic innovation.
References
American Psychological Association (2024). APA Research Ethics Code: A Guide to Ethical Standards in Research. American Psychological Association.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216-224.
Asenbaum, H. (2021). Rethinking Democratic Innovations: A Look Through the Kaleidoscope of Democratic Theory. Political Studies Review, 20 (4) 680 – 690.
Bartels, K. P. R. (2015). Communicative Capacity. Public Encounters in Participatory Theory and Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Bartels, K. P. R. (2016). ‘Doing what’s Necessary: How Encounters in Practice shape and improve Interactive Governance Work’, in Edelenbos, J. and Van Meerkerk, I. (Eds.), Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance (pp. 352-375). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
Birnie, P. et al. (2009). International Law and the Environment. Oxford University Press.
British Psychological Society (2021). BPS Code of Human Research Ethics. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Bryman, A. (2001). Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. (2006). Diagnosing and Changing Organisational Culture; New York: Josey Bass.
Caplan, P. (1987). The Cultural Construction of Sexuality. Routledge.
Cornwall, A. (2002). ‘Making Spaces, Changing Places: Situating Participation in Development,’ IDS Working Paper 173, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Cornwall, A. (2004). New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation. IDS Bulletin 35 (2), 1- 10.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Crosby, B. C. & Bryson, J. M. (2018). Why Leadership of Public Leadership Research matters: and what to do about it, Public Management Review, 20 (9), 1265–1286.
Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.
Dadze-Arthur, A. (2022). Democracy, Governance and Participation: Epistemic Colonialism in Public Administration and Governance Courses. In K. Bottom, J. Diamond, P. Dunning, & I. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of Teaching of Public Administration (pp. 218–226).
Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Dean, R., Gagnon, J. P. & Asenbaum, H. (2019). ‘What is Democratic Theory?’ Democratic Theory, 6 (2), pp. v–xx.
Denhardt, R. B. & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60 (6) 549–559.
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, 26 (1), 141–155.
Elstub, S. (2010). ‘The Third Generation of Deliberative Democracy.’ Political Studies Review, 8 (3), 291–307
Elstub, S. (2018). ‘Deliberation and Participatory Democracy.’ in A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge and M. E. Warren (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elstub, S. & Escobar, O. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance: The Field of Democratic Innovation. Edward Elgar.
Muthama, J. N. (2025). Democratic Innovation and Participation as Part of the New Public Management: A Critical Review of Gender Mainstreaming
Elstub, S., Ercan, S. & Mendonça, R. F. (2016). Editorial introduction: The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy, Critical Policy Studies, 10 (2), 139-151.
Escobar, O. (2017). ‘Pluralism and Democratic Participation: What Kind of Citizen are Citizens Invited to be?’, Contemporary Pragmatism, 14 (4), 416 - 438.
Fetters, M. D. (2019). The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing, Implementing, and Publishing Projects. Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2011). Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing a Research Project. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75 (4), 513 - 522.
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3 – 19.
Hope, K. R. (2001). The New Public Management: Context and Practice in Africa. International Public Management Journal, 4 (2), 119-134.
Hope, K. R. (2013). Managing the Public Sector in Kenya: Reform and Transformation for Improved Performance. African Journal of Public Administration and Management, 24 (1), 1-20.
Kameri-Mbote, P. (2018). Constitution as Pathways to Gender Equity in Prula Legal Systems. Oslow Law Review, 5 (1) 20 - 40.
Kenya Women Parliamentary Association (2019). Strategic Plan, 2019 - 2023. Nairobi: Women Parliamentary Association.
Kenyatta, G. N. (2023). The Political Participation of Women in Kenya. Journal of International Women's Studies, 25 (2), Article 5, 1 - 13.
Lapuente, V. & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services. Governance, 33 (3), 461 - 475.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. London: Verso.
Levitsky, S. & Way, L. (2015). The Myth of Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, 26 (1), 45 - 58.
Matthews, B. & Ross, R. (2010). Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences, Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
Muthama, J. N. (2025). Democratic Innovation and Participation as part of the New Public Management: Evaluating Gender Mainstreaming in the Kenyan Legislature. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. st Muturi, J. (21 September, 2020). Two-Thirds Gender Rule: Is Parliament the Proverbial Punching Bag? SNA Opinion Piece on the 2/3 Gender Rule. Nairobi: Office of the Speaker, National Assembly.
Nabatchi, T. & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. Jossey Bass.
Odhiambo, R. A. & Oduor, M. (2012). ‘Gender Equality,’ in Lumumba, P. L. O., Mbondenyi, M. K. & Odero, S.O, The Constitution of Kenya: Contemporary Readings. Nairobi: LawAfrica Publications, pp 99-151.
Parekh, B. (1992). ‘The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy.’ Political Studies, 40 (S1), 160-175.
Republic of Kenya (1963). The Constitution of Kenya. Nairobi: Government Printer.
Republic of Kenya (2010). The Constitution of Kenya. Nairobi: Government Printer.
Sheila McKechnie Foundation (2023). Defending our Democratic Space: A call to action. London: Sheila McKechnie Foundation and Civil Exchange.
Smith, G. (2005). Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from Around the World. London: Power Inquiry.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, G. (2019). ‘Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Democratic Innovations’, in Elstub, S. and Escobar, O. (eds) Handbook of Democratic Innovations and Governance. Edward Elgar, pp. 572–582.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Stockard, J. (1999). 'Gender Socialisation' in J. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of Gender Socialization. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pgs. 215-227.
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. & Sorensen, E. (2012). (eds) Interactive Governance: Oxford University Press.
Walliman, N. (2010). Research Methods: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Wike, R. & Fetterolf, J. (2018). Liberal Democracy’s Crisis of Confidence. Journal of Democracy, 29, (4), 136-150.
Yin, R.K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Johnson Nduya Muthama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
