Mechanical Study of Stabilised Earth Bricks with Eucalyptus Ash
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1304.18927Keywords:
Eucalyptus Wood Ash, Stabilized Earth Bricks, Compressive Strength, Water AbsorptionAbstract
Background: Given the growing concern and awareness regarding sustainable building material and environmental issue, Stabilized Earth Brick (SEB) gives the view of energy efficiency and the cost reduction of materials. And due to the limited supply of sand for cement blocks/bricks and the price of cement to be used for construction as well as the weak bricks and expensive nature of importing fire bricks in our locality. Materials: This research was aimed at stabilizing earth from a pit at BANGSHIE with eucalyptus ash to be used for construction which was achieve by sitting apart the soil at a depth of (50-100) cm from the earth surface and some Geotechnical studies carried out. Results: The studies shows that the laterite was a clay material composed of 0.6% gravel, and 14.7% sand, and the optimal dry density of 1.608 and water content 21.2% from the proctor test. The Atterberg limits test has also reveal that the soil had liquid limit of 60.0, plastic limit of 50.0 and the Plasticity index of 10.0 from which our soil was classify as A-5 using the universal soil classification system. Fifty-six (56) samples with 0 %. 5%, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 % of eucalyptus ash were moulded and the compressive strength, and total water absorption test carried out which revealed that the more the percentage of eucalyptus wood ash (EWA) the more the strengths and water absorption. With the maximum compressive strength of 1.56 MPa, and water absorption of 10.04% after 28 days. Conclusion: From these results, it was seen that for works in non-humid environment the percentage of EWA should be 20% and are economical as per using other construction materials such as the sand, cement and sundry brick.
References
Wolfskill and al., (1980), Handbook for Building Homes of Earth, 167 p. 7.
Hache, E., Simoën, M., Seck, G. S., Bonnet, C., Jabberi, A., and Carcanague, S. (2020). The impact of future power generation on cement demand: An international and regional assessment based on climate scenarios. International Economics, 163, 114-133.
Bennack, V., dallaValentina, L. O. V., and Folgueras, M. V. (2017, February). Analysis of technical suitability of using wood ash in cement-based materials. In Materials Science Forum (Vol. 881, pp. 341-345). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
Berra, M., Mangialardi, T., and Paolini, A. E. (2015). Reuse of woody biomass fly ash in cement-based materials. Construction and Building Materials, 76, 286-296.
Ukrainczyk, N., Vrbos, N., and Koenders, E. A. (2016). Reuse of woody biomass ash waste in cementitious materials. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, 30(2), 137-148.Varying Soil Compositions (Master’s thesis)
Carević, I., Serdar, M., Štirmer, N., and Ukrainczyk, N. (2019). Preliminary screening of wood biomass ashes for partial resources replacements in cementitious materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 1045-1064.
Rajamma, R., Ball, R. J., Tarelho, L. A., Allen, G. C., Labrincha, J. A., and Ferreira, V. M. (2009). Characterization and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials. Journal of hazardous materials, 172(2-3), 1049-1060.
Sigvardsen, N. M., Kirkelund, G. M., Jensen, P. E., Geiker, M. R., and Ottosen, L. M. (2019). Impact of production parameters on physiochemical characteristics of wood ash for possible utilisation in cementbased materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 230-240.
Amu, O. O., Ogunniyi, S. A., and Oladeji, O. O. (2011). Geotechnical properties of lateritic soil stabilized with sugarcane straw ash. American journal of Scientific and industrial Research, 2(2), 323-331.
Sklivaniti, V., Tsakiridis, P. E., Katsiotis, N. S., Velissariou, D., Pistofidis, N., Papageorgiou, D., and Beazi, M. (2017). Valorisation of woody biomass bottom ash in Portland cement: A characterization and hydration study. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 5(1), 205-213.
ASTM D 2216 – “Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil, Rock, and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures”.
NF EN 933-2 (2020) ; Essais pour déterminer les caractéristiques géométriques des granulats - Partie 2 : détermination de la granularité - Tamis de contrôle, dimensions nominales des ouvertures
ASTM D4318 “Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils”
NF P94-093 (1999) “Soils : investigation and testing. Determination of the compaction characteristics of a soil. Standard Proctor test. Modified Proctor test ». 41
IJSCET : International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology[13] (ISSN: 2180-3242) Vol 4, No 2, 2013 Published by: University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) and Concrete Society of Malaysia (CSM).
FV Riza, IA Rahman, AMA Zaidi, Possibility of lime as a stabilizer in compressed earth brick (CEB) Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, 2011
IS 875-1 (1987): Code of Practice For Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake)For Buildings And Structures, Part 1: Dead Loads - Unit Weights of Building Material And Stored Materials (Incorporating IS 1911 : 1967) [CED 37: Structural Safety]
C.A. O'Flaherty (1988) "Highways, Volume 2: Highway Engineering".
BS 3921. (1985) “Classification of bricks by compressive strength and water absorption”
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mbuh Moses Kuma, Mofor Nelson Alakeh, Makomra Valentin, Fangfoh Louis Ndiyun, Aponleneh Randy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.