Analysis of Revenue Allocation of Power Plants

Authors

  • Athikom Bangviwat The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
  • Orathai Chaisinboon The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
  • Apinya Puapattanakul The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1303.18724

Keywords:

Electricity generation, Returns to Factors, Cash flow analysis, Sustainable Development

Abstract

The study focuses on the returns to factors of electricity production by six (6) different technologies, which are natural gas-fired, coal-fired, biomass, hydropower, wind turbine, and solar photovoltaic power plants. Cash flow analysis is used to identify the allocation of the plants' revenues to the owners of the factors of production and stakeholders through the companies' financial statements to different factors of production, namely fuels, operation and maintenance expense, utilities, personnel wages, taxes, interests, loans, and dividends, in addition to the investment promoting parameters, like payback period, net present value, and internal rate of return, to fulfill the requirement for sustainable development. Power plants of different technologies, require different proportions of factors of production, and investments. The revenues are allocated to the owners of the factors of the production, including fuel and utility suppliers, workers, owners, financial institutes, as interests and loans, and the government and society as taxes. The major expenses of natural gas-fired, coal-fired, and biomass power plants are for operation activities, including fuel costs and O&M costs. Differently, for other technologies, which are hydropower, wind turbine, and solar photovoltaic power plants, the major portions of their revenue are re-turned to the investing activities of the power plants. 

References

Ecoholics. Types of Production Function. [cited 2025 30 March]; Available from: https://ecoholics.in/types-of-production-function/.

Cobb, C.W. and P.H. Douglas, A Theory of Production. The American Economic Review, 1928. 18(1): p. 139-165.

Gordon, D.V., Richard The Historical Role Of The Production Function In Economics And Business. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 2011. 4(4): p. 25-30.

Nitisha. 3 Types of Production Functions – Explained! ; Available from: https://www.economicsdiscussion.net/production/3-types-of-production-functions-explained/3659.

Felipe, J., et.al., Production Function Estimation: Biased Coefficients and Endogenous Regressors, or a Case of Collective Amnesia? Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 2021.

Aguirregabiria, V., Econometric Issues and methods in the Estimation of Production Functions. Munich Personal RePEc Archi (MPRA).

Eberhardt, M. and C. Helmers, Untested assumptions and data slicing: a critical review of firm-level production function estimators. 2010, University of Oxford. 587

Nomidis, D., The Mistakes of the Marginal Productivity Theory of Income Distribution. June 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326195341.

Lars Pålsson Syll, “Piketty and the limits of marginal productivity theory”, real-world economics review, issue no. 69, 7 Oct 2014, pp. 36-43, http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue69/Syll69.pdf.

Victor, A., Econometric Issues and Methods in the Estimation of Production Functions, 2009, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No. 15973, Available at: http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/15973/.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Sustainable Development. [cited 2025 8 March]; Available from: https://www.iisd.org/mission-and-goals/sustainable-development#.

Rosemary, C. Net Present Value (NPV) As a Capital Budgeting Method. 2022 November 29, 2022; Available from: https://www.thebalancemoney.com/net-present-value-npv-as-a-capital-budgeting-method-392915.

Somnath, D., Cash flow ratios and financial performance: A comparative study Accounting 2019. 5(1).

The IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme (IEA PVPS), National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in THAILAND 2021. 2021. p. 27.

SPP, Feasibility study of a cogeneration gas-fired power plant. 1997.

Rokhmawati, A., et al., Quantifying social costs of coal-fired power plant generation. Geography and Sustainability, 2023. 4(1): p. 39-48.

Biomass Financial Model, USAID Clean Power Asia, Editor. 2020.

Asian Development Bank (ADB), The Theun-Hinboun Hydropower Project (LOAN 1329-LAO [SF]). 2000.

Wind Financial Model, USAID Clean Power Asia, Editor. 2020.

Solar Financial Model, USAID Clean Power Asia, Editor. 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Bangviwat, A., Chaisinboon, O., & Puapattanakul, A. (2025). Analysis of Revenue Allocation of Power Plants. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(03), 578–588. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1303.18724