Aboard the Soviet Submarine B-59: The Crucial Role of Human Judgment During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1301.18321Keywords:
Artificial intelligence (AI), Cuban Missile Crisis, Data analysis, Decision, Ethical dilemma, Geopolitics, Human judgment, Nuclear warAbstract
The heroic action of Vasily Arkhipov, a Soviet officer, during the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, highlights the essential role of human judgment in moments of extreme crisis. While artificial intelligence (AI) systems can swiftly analyze vast quantities of data and react instantaneously to various situations, they are constrained by inherent limitations when confronted with ethical dilemmas and human uncertainties. In contrast to AI, Vasily Arkhipov’s decision was informed not only by military data but also by a nuanced understanding of human and diplomatic considerations, ultimately averting a nuclear disaster. This pivotal moment underscores the necessity of preserving human involvement in critical decision-making contexts, where intuition and discernment are indispensable. Although AI can offer valuable analytical insights, it cannot replicate the capacity for judgment required to assess situations with profound moral and social implications. This article argues that AI should serve as a complement to human decision-making, never replacing it, especially in matters with far-reaching consequences.
References
Allison, G., & Zelikow, P. (1971 [1999]). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Barash, D. (2021). Close calls: When nuclear Armageddon threatened to destroy civilization. Skeptic, 26(1), 39‒46.
Buchanan, B., & Imbrie, A. (2024). The new fire: War, peace, and democracy in the age of AI. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Cyr, A. (2022). The Cuban Missile Crisis: Miscalculation, nuclear risks, and the human dimension. Parameters, 52(3), Article 11.
Dobbs, M. (2009). One minute to midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the brink of nuclear war. London: Hutchinson.
Funk, R. (2024). Minimal units of consciousness and possible evolution of intelligence. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(3), 151‒188.
Hastings, M. (2022). The abyss: Nuclear crisis Cuba 1962. New York: HarperCollins.
Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A threat to strategic stability. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 16‒39.
Karinshak, E. (2024). Simulations in human‐AI crisis management systems. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 32(1), Article e12525.
Lebow, R., & Pelopidas, B. (2023). Facing nuclear war: Luck, learning, and the Cuban Missile Crisis. In Bukovansky, M., Keene, E., Reus-Smit, C., & Spanu, M. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of history and international relations (pp. 705‒720). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leys, N. (2020). Autonomous weapon systems, international crises, and anticipatory self-defense. Yale Journal of International Law, 45(2), 377‒411.
Lushenko, P. (2023). AI and the future of warfare: The troubling evidence from the U.S. military. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November 23. https://thebulletin.org/2023/11/ai-and-the-future-of-warfare-thetroubling-evidence-from-the-us-military/
McKeown, T. (2000). The Cuban Missile Crisis and politics as usual. The Journal of Politics, 62(1), 70‒87.
Mikoyan, S. (2012). The Soviet Cuban Missile Crisis: Castro, Mikoyan, Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the missiles of November. Redwood City (CA): Stanford University Press.
Morgan, W. (2023). The Cuban Missile Crisis at 60: Where do we stand? Marine Corps History, 9(1), 31‒53.
Mozgovoi, A. (2002). The Cuban samba of the quartet of foxtrots: Soviet submarines in the Caribbean crisis of 1962. Moscow: Military Parade.
Munton, D., & Welch, D. (2006). The Cuban Missile Crisis: A concise history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Savranskaya, S. (2005). New sources on the role of Soviet submarines in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Journal of Strategic Studies, 28(2), 233–259.
Sfetcu, L. (2024). Algorithmic management: Theoretical perspectives and implications for organizational development. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 66, 389–397.
Simon, H. (1997 [1947]). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Szabadföldi, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence in military application–Opportunities and challenges. Land Forces Academy Review, 26(2), 157‒165.
Tertrais, B. (2017). “On the brink”–Really? Revisiting nuclear close calls since 1945. The Washington Quarterly, 40(2), 51–66.
Turco, R., Toon, O., Ackerman, T., Pollack, J., & Sagan, C. (1983). Nuclear winter: Global consequences of multiple nuclear explosions. Science, 222(4630), 1283–1292.
Vandenbroucke, L. (1984). Anatomy of a failure: The decision to land at the Bay of Pigs. Political Science Quarterly, 99(3), 471–491.
Weick, K. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.
Yanitsky, O. (2019). Some conceptual issues of modern geopolitics: A view from Russia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(4), 115–125.
Zala, B. (2024). Should AI stay or should AI go? First strike incentives and deterrence stability. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 154–163.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gilles Paché
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
