A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis on Cyber Stigmatization -----A Case of Microblogging Discourse on BMW Car Crash
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.511.5589Keywords:
critical discourse analysis, corpus, semantic preference, semantic prosody, stigmatizationAbstract
Cyber stigmatization has become an increasingly common phenomenon on social media, which usually involves the topics of culture, gender, race, illness and disease. Individuals or collective identities who are stigmatized usually feel different and devalued by others. The present study is conducted from the perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis, assisted by corpus linguistics software, which attempts to reveal the discourse power behind cyber stigmatization by discussing netizens’ emotions and ideologies in the microblogging discourse on BMW Car Crash in Nanjing. With the quantitative and qualitative analysis of 4857 comment collected on Weibo platform under the assistant of AntConc and KHcoder, the findings suggest that: (1) The discussion of network events usually goes through a topic-shift process, and an expansion of discussion area; (2) Many grass-roots netizens get a relatively strong discourse power when expressing opinions on network. They tend to stigmatize a certain social group by stereotypical ideas; (3) Different social status and limited power in real life make netizens generate a strong desire for equality. It is recommended that government should strictly use legal right and resource to guide netizens to analyze problems rationally, so as to reduce the biased and malicious phenomena of “labelling” and “stigmatization”.References
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., McEnery, T. Sketching Muslims: A corpus-driven analysis of representation around the word “Muslim” in the British press, 1998-2009[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2013, 34(3): 255–278.
Bin, Xin. Foucault’s theory of power and critical discourse analysis [J]. Foreign Language Research, 2006, (2): 1-6.
Bin, Shao & Zhiming, Hui. “Chinese Dream” in western media: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis [J]. Foreign Languages Research, 2014, (6): 28-33.
Butler, R.C. & Gillis, J.M. The impact of labels and behaviors on the stigmatization of adults with Asperger’s disorder [J]. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2011, 41 (6):741-749.
Branum J & Charteris-Black J. The Edward Snowden affair: A corpus study of the British press[J]. Discourse & Communication, 2015, 9(2):1 –22.
Cheng, W., Lam, P. W. Y. Western perceptions of Hong Kong ten years on: A corpus-driven critical discourse study [J]. Applied Linguistics, 2013, 34(2): 173-190.
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. The Bologna Process and the Knowledge-based Economy: A Critical discourse analysis approach [J]. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2008, (24): 109-126.
Firth, J.R. Modes of meaning[A]. In J.R. Firth(ed.). Papers in Linguistics 1934-51[C]. London, Oxford University Press, 1957, 190-215.
Foucault, M. The thought of the outside [C]. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Aesthetics, method, and epistemology. New York, NY: The New Press, 1998b, pp. 147-170.
Fowler, N. On critical linguistics[C]. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London, Routledge. 1996, 3-14.
Haixia, Guo. New social networking features and model analysis of information dissemination [J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2012, (1): 56-59.
Hardt-Mautner, G. Only connect: Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics [J]. University of Lancaster, 1995.
Herring, S. C. Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication [J]. New media and Society, 2004, 6(1): 26-36.
Kim, K. H. Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis [J]. Discourse & Society, 2014, 25 (2): 221–244.
Latner J D. & Stunkard A J. Getting worse: the stigmatization of obese children [J]. Obesity Research, 2003, 11(3): 452-456.
McEnery, T., Potts A., Xiao R. London 2012 Games Media Impact Study [EB/OL]. [2014-07-23]. https: // www.gov.uk / government/ publications / London-2012-media-impact study.
Nerlich, B. & Jaspal, R. UK media representations of carbon capture and storage: Actors, frames and metaphors [J]. Metaphor and the Social World, 2013, 3(1): 35-53.
Sinclair, J. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse [M]. London, Routledge, 2004, 141-148.
van Dijk, T. Mediating racism: the role of the media in the reproduction of racism [C]. In: Wodak R (ed) Language, power and ideology: studies in political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 199-226.
Van Leeuwen, T. The representation of social actors [C]. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Text and Practices: readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 32-70.
Wodak, R. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as usual [M]. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009.
Yeshua-Katz, D. Online stigma resistance in the Pro-Ana community [J]. Qualitative Health Research, 2015, 25(10):1347-1358.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
