Analyzing Collaborative Interaction In Learners’ Task-Based Oral Discourse

Authors

  • Abd Razak Zakaria UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.13.114

Keywords:

oral discourse, collaborative interaction, argumentative episodes, communication tasks

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate how learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) interacted during task completion using two different communication task types i.e. jigsaw and decision-making. The focus of investigations was the dynamics of learner interaction and the kind of oral discourse generated by the participants. The data for the study comprised transcribed recordings of learner interactions working on given tasks. They were qualitatively analyzed focusing on the social processing. Findings revealed that the participants attempted task completion collaboratively. The collaborative interaction was characterized by argumentative episodes. However, close examination showed that the participants engaged in more intensive argumentative negotiations which were highly collaborative during decision-making task completion than during task completion of the jigsaw task type. The results suggest that communication task types elicited collaborative interaction episodes with argumentative negotiations and these kinds of interactions are believed to be important particularly for learners at the tertiary level.

Keywords: oral discourse, collaborative interaction, argumentative episodes, communication tasks

Author Biography

Abd Razak Zakaria, UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION AND HUMANITIES

References

Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.) Handbook of the Learning Sciences (443-459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Basturkmen, H. (2002). Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 233-242.

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetoric approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Candela, A. (1997). Demonstrations and problem-solving exercises in school science: Their transformation within the Mexican elementary school classroom. Science Education, 81, 497-513.

Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908.

Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.

Ellis, R. (2004). Task-based language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Franco, M. E. P. (1996). Designing a writing component for teen courses at a Brazilian language institute. In Kathleen G. (Ed.), Teachers as course developers. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gerlach, J. M. (1994). Is this collaboration? New directions in teaching and learning, 59, 5-14.

Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. CA: Sage Publications.

Kowal, M & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing. How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (284-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kumpulainen, K. & Wray, D. (2002). (eds). Classroom interaction and social learning: from theory to practice. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Nonnative Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.

Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass and C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition: Second language acquisition volume 2 (413-468). New York: Academic Press.

Mercer, N. Phillips, T. & Somekh, B. (1991). Research note, spoken language and new technology (SLANT). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 195-202.

Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 94-121.

Olsen, J. W-B & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning. In Kessler, C. (Ed), Cooperative language learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Pica, T. & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (115-132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds), Input in Second Language Acquisition (235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in the study of language (125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M. (2001). Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 44 – 63.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251-274.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (99-118). Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

Wells, G. (1987). The meaning makers: children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books Inc.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-15

How to Cite

Zakaria, A. R. (2014). Analyzing Collaborative Interaction In Learners’ Task-Based Oral Discourse. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.13.114